What does it all mean–Election 2009
Nov 4th, 2009 by David Anderson
Nothing it was all local according to CNN. The Republican in me hopes they really believe that. Sure the elections had a local factor, the economy hurts locally all across America. Now let’s look at what this means nationally.
People are hurting and the Ruling Party is focused on other issues. The stimulus package stimulated mostly governments and Wall Street while foreclosures at a record high and unemployment soars especially when you take into count those who are no longer counted. What is the ruling regime focused on? Increasing government power over health care and energy not empowering the individual to make a better life. The dollar is being weakened. The job front is dismal with experts predicting high unemployment for up to 5 years. There is no long term housing strategy. Money was handed to the banks without buying assets or requiring reworking of troubled loans to allow them to be restructured. The ruling regime betrayed the bankrupt. It attacked business. They retroactively disqualified national guardsman from bonuses. They designed a health care reform that they don’t even understand, but seems poised to leave tens of millions uninsured, raise premiums, cut medicare, hurt state budgets, cost a trillion dollars, and increase government control over health care. There energy plan actually makes less energy available and raises costs with little proven environmental impact.
With these facts in mind, why wouldn’t independent voters move away from the Democrats? The ruling regime has about 6 months to drop the left wing nonsense and work on the people’s agenda. If it does not, there is another party that has finally awaken from its lethargy. The GOP has a lot of thoughtful local candidates who can create a national wave. Ignore the off year elections if you want, and in 2010 we will ignore you at the ballot box.
Bottom line: BO has a Marxist agenda, and the people finally have caught-on.