<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shorter Delaware Liberal Commenter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawarepolitics.net/shorter-delaware-liberal-commenter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/shorter-delaware-liberal-commenter/</link>
	<description>Where public policy meets common sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:13:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/shorter-delaware-liberal-commenter/comment-page-1/#comment-13675</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=3586#comment-13675</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;You guys have this so wrong. It’s all about beer and the marketing....&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

True. And, parenthetically, why would anyone drink Corona,  when the first thing they tell you when visiting Mexico is &#039;don&#039;t drink the water?&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;You guys have this so wrong. It’s all about beer and the marketing&#8230;.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>True. And, parenthetically, why would anyone drink Corona,  when the first thing they tell you when visiting Mexico is &#8216;don&#8217;t drink the water?&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RSmitty</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/shorter-delaware-liberal-commenter/comment-page-1/#comment-13641</link>
		<dc:creator>RSmitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=3586#comment-13641</guid>
		<description>...and yet we still do have a problem of perception and no one here dared even touch that.  If anything, inflamed it.

Nemski, I would never dare defend the spirit of the comment laid at us by Rick, so don&#039;t even try to stir that pot at me.

To what Joanne said, unfortunately, she&#039;s pretty accurate.  I do truly wonder how much any American (more specifically, non-Mexican-American) would be aware of the significance of the Cinco De Mayo holiday if it weren&#039;t for the liquor industry.  Sadly enough, most people think it&#039;s about Mexican independence.  Buzz...(as in wrong answer).

So, while I won&#039;t argue against Adam&#039;s comment, as this point was taken up a while back, and had enough evidence to it, that the program was at least temporarily halted, the Republican Party does continue to have an image problem of racism.  Granted, it&#039;s not in-your-face, but we have a tolerance of blatant ignorance when it comes to issues such as these.  I couldn&#039;t give a rat&#039;s ass about what &quot;they&quot; do (as in DL, etc), but am more concerned about what we need to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and yet we still do have a problem of perception and no one here dared even touch that.  If anything, inflamed it.</p>
<p>Nemski, I would never dare defend the spirit of the comment laid at us by Rick, so don&#8217;t even try to stir that pot at me.</p>
<p>To what Joanne said, unfortunately, she&#8217;s pretty accurate.  I do truly wonder how much any American (more specifically, non-Mexican-American) would be aware of the significance of the Cinco De Mayo holiday if it weren&#8217;t for the liquor industry.  Sadly enough, most people think it&#8217;s about Mexican independence.  Buzz&#8230;(as in wrong answer).</p>
<p>So, while I won&#8217;t argue against Adam&#8217;s comment, as this point was taken up a while back, and had enough evidence to it, that the program was at least temporarily halted, the Republican Party does continue to have an image problem of racism.  Granted, it&#8217;s not in-your-face, but we have a tolerance of blatant ignorance when it comes to issues such as these.  I couldn&#8217;t give a rat&#8217;s ass about what &#8220;they&#8221; do (as in DL, etc), but am more concerned about what we need to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hube</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/shorter-delaware-liberal-commenter/comment-page-1/#comment-13634</link>
		<dc:creator>Hube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=3586#comment-13634</guid>
		<description>Adam: Well, according to the left-wing loons (DL obviously included), all &lt;i&gt;conservative&lt;/i&gt; whites are racists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam: Well, according to the left-wing loons (DL obviously included), all <i>conservative</i> whites are racists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Kissel</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/shorter-delaware-liberal-commenter/comment-page-1/#comment-13626</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Kissel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=3586#comment-13626</guid>
		<description>The University of Delaware Office of Residence Life was (maybe still is) teaching RAs that ALL whites are racists. For evidence see this video about their re-education program:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EbQfmVoOfM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The University of Delaware Office of Residence Life was (maybe still is) teaching RAs that ALL whites are racists. For evidence see this video about their re-education program:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EbQfmVoOfM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EbQfmVoOfM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/shorter-delaware-liberal-commenter/comment-page-1/#comment-13625</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=3586#comment-13625</guid>
		<description>You guys have this so wrong.  It&#039;s all about beer and the marketing.  Big deal--it finally came to Delaware.  Having lived in California, and seeing the &quot;poor showing&quot;,  of bar celebrations on St. Patrick&#039;s Day, and then the phenomenal showings for Cinco de Mayo, the liquor industry was onto to something.  The influx and popularity of the whole &quot;new&quot; Mexican beer market brought to the US in the last decade, has only added to the popularity and prevalence of this new &quot;themed&quot; day of adult beverage attraction.  Now who wants to argue with me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys have this so wrong.  It&#8217;s all about beer and the marketing.  Big deal&#8211;it finally came to Delaware.  Having lived in California, and seeing the &#8220;poor showing&#8221;,  of bar celebrations on St. Patrick&#8217;s Day, and then the phenomenal showings for Cinco de Mayo, the liquor industry was onto to something.  The influx and popularity of the whole &#8220;new&#8221; Mexican beer market brought to the US in the last decade, has only added to the popularity and prevalence of this new &#8220;themed&#8221; day of adult beverage attraction.  Now who wants to argue with me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noman</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/shorter-delaware-liberal-commenter/comment-page-1/#comment-13623</link>
		<dc:creator>noman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=3586#comment-13623</guid>
		<description>Rick gets a pass on that one because it was funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick gets a pass on that one because it was funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pandora</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/shorter-delaware-liberal-commenter/comment-page-1/#comment-13622</link>
		<dc:creator>pandora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=3586#comment-13622</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s comments like Rick&#039;s that turn perception into reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s comments like Rick&#8217;s that turn perception into reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemski</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/shorter-delaware-liberal-commenter/comment-page-1/#comment-13619</link>
		<dc:creator>nemski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=3586#comment-13619</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Cinco de Mayo was the day the first illegal Mexican recieved a U.S. welfare check in Los Angeles. Viva la Estados Unidos!&lt;/i&gt;

RSmitty keep on defending people like this, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Cinco de Mayo was the day the first illegal Mexican recieved a U.S. welfare check in Los Angeles. Viva la Estados Unidos!</i></p>
<p>RSmitty keep on defending people like this, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/shorter-delaware-liberal-commenter/comment-page-1/#comment-13618</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=3586#comment-13618</guid>
		<description>Cinco de Mayo was the day the first illegal Mexican recieved a U.S. welfare check in Los Angeles. Viva la Estados Unidos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cinco de Mayo was the day the first illegal Mexican recieved a U.S. welfare check in Los Angeles. Viva la Estados Unidos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pandora</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/shorter-delaware-liberal-commenter/comment-page-1/#comment-13614</link>
		<dc:creator>pandora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=3586#comment-13614</guid>
		<description>Perception problems, once they take hold, are difficult to shake off.  How many times have we heard that State employees are lazy, or that teachers don&#039;t work an eight hour day and only work for nine months?   Those perceptions are bogus, and yet they persist to varying degrees - just check the comment section of any blog when the subject comes up.

This Republican perception problem is actually quite amazing, given the fact that nobody had better, more consistent message (perception) delivery than the GOP.  For years they were the party &quot;perceived&quot; as supporting the troops, as being fiscally responsible - as compared to those tax and spend Dems, tough on crime, fighting terrorists, etc.  

So what happened?  A series of things, the economy and the War in Iraq most obviously, wrecked a huge chunk of the GOP&#039;s perception. 

Republicans have lost their footing on the economy and the war, and while they struggle to find their way, social conservatives, who haven&#039;t missed a beat, took center stage.  Right now the only consistent message (perception) coming from the Republican party is on issues like abortion, gay marriage, and, the ever popular, Obama is a... (fill in the blank).

And while their may be room in the Republican platform for such issues, they can&#039;t be the only issues.  And even though they weren&#039;t the majority, some of the tea party signs didn&#039;t help the perception - any more than some of the anti-war signs helped the Dems.

Perception can also change by doing something unexpected.  The unexpected can change the dialogue.  Right now the loyal opposition is perceived as the party of no - for good reason, imo.  Now, I&#039;m not getting into a policy debate, and frankly neither should Republicans... since it isn&#039;t serving them well.  My advice would be to find something you can do, rather than stop.  Think &quot;for&quot; instead of &quot;against.&quot;

Just thoughts from a liberal.  Do with them as you will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perception problems, once they take hold, are difficult to shake off.  How many times have we heard that State employees are lazy, or that teachers don&#8217;t work an eight hour day and only work for nine months?   Those perceptions are bogus, and yet they persist to varying degrees &#8211; just check the comment section of any blog when the subject comes up.</p>
<p>This Republican perception problem is actually quite amazing, given the fact that nobody had better, more consistent message (perception) delivery than the GOP.  For years they were the party &#8220;perceived&#8221; as supporting the troops, as being fiscally responsible &#8211; as compared to those tax and spend Dems, tough on crime, fighting terrorists, etc.  </p>
<p>So what happened?  A series of things, the economy and the War in Iraq most obviously, wrecked a huge chunk of the GOP&#8217;s perception. </p>
<p>Republicans have lost their footing on the economy and the war, and while they struggle to find their way, social conservatives, who haven&#8217;t missed a beat, took center stage.  Right now the only consistent message (perception) coming from the Republican party is on issues like abortion, gay marriage, and, the ever popular, Obama is a&#8230; (fill in the blank).</p>
<p>And while their may be room in the Republican platform for such issues, they can&#8217;t be the only issues.  And even though they weren&#8217;t the majority, some of the tea party signs didn&#8217;t help the perception &#8211; any more than some of the anti-war signs helped the Dems.</p>
<p>Perception can also change by doing something unexpected.  The unexpected can change the dialogue.  Right now the loyal opposition is perceived as the party of no &#8211; for good reason, imo.  Now, I&#8217;m not getting into a policy debate, and frankly neither should Republicans&#8230; since it isn&#8217;t serving them well.  My advice would be to find something you can do, rather than stop.  Think &#8220;for&#8221; instead of &#8220;against.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just thoughts from a liberal.  Do with them as you will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

