October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month

We are dedicated to ending domestic violence where ever it is found. You cannot judge how a man treats a woman by how he treats his fellow men. I know a man who was generally well respected. Served his country, his church, and his community. He had a problem. He had unresolved issues with his mother. He took out anger on his wife. One left him. He married again in a quick courtship. He told her that he didn’t have a lot of friends in the area, he really did not want anyone warning her. They got in a fight, she fell down the stairs. Her arm got broken. He threatened her that worse would happen if she reported it. She waited until the pain got so bad that she had to go to the doctor with the typical initial cover story. Her arm did not heal right and she suffered multiple surgeries and two years of pain. She could be verbally abusive. The idea that verbal abuse justified such cruelty is abhorrent. I remember some decades ago a gentleman, a soldier, and a cousin who lived down the street from me when we grew up left his wife. She tried to kill him. She claimed that he cheated on her. Of course one could argue what came first, his feeling that she disrespected him or his alleged cheating. The idea that alleged adultery justified two attempts on his life in 5 minutes is abhorrent. Once again, I promote the idea that we need to help people gain the tools for relationship happiness and conflict resolution. The majority of violent crime in America is relationship based. We need to condemn those who take to violence as an option for non-violent offenses. We also need to begin teaching our children and adults the right way to deal with problem. It is not a problem of just men or women or parent or teen. It is a problem of humanity. The sooner we deal with it in that way, the sooner we limit its damage.

15 thoughts on “October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month”

  1. Our society becomes more violent every day. Through the mass media- music, video games, movies and television- we plant the seeds of gratuitous profanity, incivility and violence and then search for an explanation when the crop is rotten.

  2. mynym October 8, 2014 at 16:19 “Meanwhile: Feminists Claim Iconic WWII Victory Kiss Statue Depicts ‘Sexual Assault’”

    See that’s the problem with the statistics from leftists and feminists.

    Mark Twain said there are lies, damn lies, and then there are statistics.

    I.e., statistics are often a sophisticated form of lying and confusing people.

    To do this, the Left corrupts the definition to vastly inflate the numbers.

    So if a guy whistles at a woman on the street (who does that any more?) this is included in stats for sexual violence and sexual assault.

  3. Tangent…

    It seems to me that juxtapositions could be multiplied when people get this stupid about… well, almost everything.

    Millions raped and incited by Jews in the usual ways during WWII based on tribal perceptions of race and so on and not a peep from most (or any?) feminists.

    Meanwhile, one of the victorious Allies that won a war kisses a woman…. and it might be rape? Discuss. Navel gaze. Report on it more in the media. But forget this:

    “Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! Follow the precepts of Comrade Stalin. Stamp out the fascist beast once and for all in its lair! Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, kill, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army.” —Jewish Soviet propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg, in a leaflet distributed to Soviet [peasants] upon entering Germany in 1945

    Another version:

    … Dr. Mordechai Kedar stated that the only way to force “terrorists” to think twice about their actions is the threat of the rape of their sisters and mothers.
    A Middle East scholar from Bar-Ilan University in Israel, Dr. Kedar stated that “You have to understand the culture in which we live. The only thing that deters [Hamas leaders] is a threat to the connection between their heads and their shoulders.”
    Hakol Diburim (It’s All Talk) host Yossi Hadar then asked if that consideration “could filter down” the ranks of Hamas, Kedar responded “No, because lower down the considerations are entirely different. Terrorists like those who kidnapped the children and killed them – the only thing that deters them is if they know that their sister or their mother will be raped in the event that they are caught. What can you do, that’s the culture in which we live.” (Israeli Professor: Rape Palestinian Sisters and Mothers To Stop Terrorism by Brandon Turbeville)

    I guess they can’t poop supposed rainbows of civil rights and equality all the time… huh? For the goyim, maybe… but for those that fancy themselves as members of a superior tribe themselves it seems to be: “Rape them.” Did any Friedan/Steinen feminists speak up about that in order to be hailed in the Judeo/corporate media as great crusaders for civil rights in their own tribe? I think Naomi Wolf walked out of her synagogue due to her perception of their tribalism. So there was that. But that seemed to be the extent of it. I don’t really recall them dealing with their own culture and their own nationalism and racism first and foremost. Too busy with policing and managing the goyim while seeing to it that a Talmudic view of abortion (And their secular versions of it.) is supposedly a part of “feminism,” it would seem.

    Not that they would see it that way, even if that’s exactly what they keep doing. After all, perceptions vary…

  4. To do this, the Left corrupts the definition to vastly inflate the numbers.

    The Left vs. the Right is a very thinly veiled way of saying men vs. women, which is a denial of marriage and balance. And that’s always absurd and utterly destructive, on all sides.

    As I keep saying in other threads, all of you should just go ahead and demolish Washington’s Monument (the male) and the Capital Dome (the female) and America’s tradition of balance giving birth to a more perfect union and Liberty. You’re usually all out of balance. Or have you not noticed that? (It already happened in the financial center of the world that contained the same symbolism. So why not complete it?)

    That applies to all of you, whether it’s the Right idolizing War Inc. while it leaves “wounded warriors” in its wake (On waiting lists that amount to death panels in your own national security state, etc.). Or the Left playing pretend that there’s a “war on women” because someone might have to pay for their own birth control.

    Why does there have to be a supposedly huge difference between Delaware Politics and Delaware Liberal? It’s not really in your interests to be wedged apart by corrupt politicians based on Left/Right psychological wedge issues. (Even if those issues are important sometimes, it’s equally important not to let them be used by charlatans… seems to me.)

    Big Ramble

  5. WHAT DO WOMEN THINK?

    Is this sailor’s kiss in the celebration in Times Square in New York City SEXUAL ASSAULT?

    Note: The unfortunate name for the statue refers to the unconditional surrender of Japan, after the earlier unconditional surrender of the Axis Powers in Europe. I wonder if mis-educated leftists don’t know enough history and are confused by the unfortunate name.

    http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/10/07/Feminists-Demand-Removal-of-WWII-Commemorative-Statue

  6. I think people need to get out of entertaining movements invented by Steinem/Friedman/Goldstein/Jews and think for themselves about who they are, for themselves.

    Perspectives vary, especially for clueless Christian Zionists being led by “neoconservatives” like some Fox News bimbo asking William Kristol what he thinks about the MidEast. For example, culturally:

    In a tidy coincidence, two separate videos went viral last week, demonstrating that American Jews’ love affair with obscenity is still going strong. Sarah Silverman talks about being visited by Jesus Christ, who asks her to spread a message about women’s reproductive rights (“We’ve got to legislate that sh*t,” the comedienne said, mocking conservatives who want to use the law to limit women’s health care options), while a fan-produced supercut strung together three minutes of uninterrupted insults by Larry David on “Curb Your Enthusiasm.”
    As far as I know, only Silverman has publicly called herself a “dirty Jew,” purring the words alluringly in her 2005 performance film “Jesus Is Magic,” but David’s gleeful, exuberant and inimitable spewing of obscenities suggests he might not exactly mind being thought of as a dirty Jew, either.
    In my recently published book, “Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews, and American Culture,” I explain why, beginning in the late 19th century, American Jews have found the explicit representation of sex, and four-letter words, so very useful. The answers vary: Some Jews use obscenity to fight anti-Semitism, while others use it to rewrite traditional Jewish stories in a contemporary idiom.
    …..
    ….Christian campaigns against obscenity – and the vague, recrudescent sense promoted by Scalia’s remark that the people using obscenity are not sufficiently Christian or authentically American – may help to explain why, in a media environment in which the representation of sex and the use of taboo language smacks increasingly of banality, [“””]brilliant[“”””] performers like David and Silverman continue not only to assert their Jewishness emphatically, in virtually every one of their performances, but also to glory in and glorify the use of such language. Especially because the Christian right goes to such great lengths to demonstrate that Jews should not feel excluded from its initiatives – who loves Jews nowadays more than the Christian right, right? – identifying oneself as a “dirty Jew” in 21st-century America is one way to signal your opposition not just to the banalities of the market-driven family-friendly culture, but also to the nation’s most powerful socially, religiously and politically reactionary movement. Haaretz

    I linked behind their pay wall for you.

    Note this:

    The answers vary: Some Jews use obscenity to fight anti-Semitism, while others use it to rewrite traditional Jewish stories in a contemporary idiom.

    The culture that you worship and value instead of creating and cultivating your own? What are its traditions, exactly? Why is it that Friedman/Steinem/Guttmacher and others are abortionists and change everything into tribal identity politics?

    A sexual revolution. As if the Jewish idea of turning the rich and the poor into tribes for class warfare was not bad enough, they to try to turn men and women into separate tribes too. Seriously.

    What’s next? A bathroom revolution, no doubt… but after the supposed transgender tribe supposedly has its “Awareness Raised” and its interests served as a tribe, then what? Fat people. Could that be another tribe or interest group? It would probably take a member of the Tribe that seems to fancy itself above all others to “raise awareness” about that and organize fat people into a group/tribe.

    My advice to the next Friedman/Goldstein/Steinem or whoever trying to create tribal revolutions based on identity politics… stop it. Do nothing. Get out of politics and go plant a garden.

    Leave the goyim alone. They’re not perfect, not at all. But all these “revolutions” are not really helping anyone.

  7. Almost humorous, note his tribal perspective:

    …identifying oneself as a “dirty Jew” in 21st-century America is one way to signal your opposition not just to the banalities of the market-driven family-friendly culture, but also to the nation’s most powerful socially, religiously and politically reactionary movement.

    Only someone with a Talmudic mentality with respect to the goyim or a secular version of the same could celebrate acting like an ass while simultaneously arguing that any “reaction” from the goy to asinine attacks is… “reactionary.”

    And antisemitic, no doubt…. wouldn’t you agree? Ironically many Jews still tend to view you, Moseley, as powerful for now. Things would most likely change if they thought that there actually was a Muslim Manchurian candidate (as you’ve said). Then you could celebrate Sam Harris and Bill Maher* suddenly being very much “on your side” instead of essentially waging a culture war (“New Atheist,” religion is ridiculous, etc.) against you through “mainstream” media. Apparently they perceive “you” as powerful. I guess that’s true, although not in your specific case.

    At least someone commented:

    Larry David and Sarah Silverman and Jews in the American entertainment industry are not challenging America’s powerful religious, family-friendly culture — they (we) are destroying it. Or rather have almost completely finished that job. America and Americans were and are very generous to (us) Jews. They didn’t deserve this.

    Yup. If the media didn’t play a role, then people wouldn’t spend billions in advertizing. Anyway, America is headed toward fiscal and moral bankruptcy due to its media and currency… so what now?

    Fascism, as the reasons are exposed more and more and that’s the way that people trend anyway when confronted with Talmudism? Or Constitutionalism and Americanism, given that much of it would have never happened in the first place if more than lip service was given to American traditions?

  8. mynym October 9, 2014 at 14:06 “In a tidy coincidence, two separate videos went viral last week, demonstrating that American Jews’ love affair with obscenity is still going strong. Sarah Silverman talks about being visited by Jesus Christ, who asks her to spread a message about women’s reproductive rights ”

    Sarah Silverman is quite conspicuously an ATHEIST. Sarah Silverman is also the most perfect example of white trash I think I have ever seen. She isn’t remotely funny, just obnoxious.

    If God had not made her beautiful, she would be getting fired from one short-order-cook / burger flipping job after another. She isn’t good enough to be compared with short order cooks, who deserve more respect.

    So Sarah Silverman is certainly NOT a Jew in the context that you are trying to argue. That is, she has no connection ore relationship whatsoever with anything Jewish, especially not religious but also not culturally. Her entire life is a complete rejection of her Jewish ethnicity.

    Most of the Jews who are influential in entertainment are atheist / secular Jews, who do not reflect or represent Judaism in any way.

    A Muslim convert to Christianity does not represent Islam.

    An atheist who grew up Catholic does not represent Catholicism.

    The people you are objecting to as Jews are absolutely in contradiction with being Jewish.

  9. Sarah Silverman is quite conspicuously an ATHEIST. Sarah Silverman is also the most perfect example of white trash I think I have ever seen. She isn’t remotely funny, just obnoxious.

    Sarah Silverman says “I would kill Christ again”

    “Brilliant.”

    Because:

    ….performers like David and Silverman continue not only to assert their Jewishness emphatically, in virtually every one of their performances, but also to glory in and glorify the use of such language. Especially because the Christian right goes to such great lengths to demonstrate that Jews should not feel excluded from its initiatives – who loves Jews nowadays more than the Christian right, right? – identifying oneself as a “dirty Jew” in 21st-century America is one way to signal your opposition not just to the banalities of the market-driven family-friendly culture, but also to the nation’s most powerful socially, religiously and politically reactionary movement. Haaretz

    If God had not made her beautiful, she would be getting fired from one short-order-cook / burger flipping job after another.

    White trash, short order cook? What are you talking about, your voting bloc? The people that many Jews say that they view as enemies, fit to be degraded?

    No, she’s Jewish… whatever that means.

    Seemingly, a ‘liberated’ Jew is disturbed by the fact that the Jewish community is ‘shrinking’. One may wonder why a liberated being, a ‘progressive’ Jew and a ‘socialist’, is concerned with issues to do with assimilation and the disintegration of a ‘reactionary’ tribal and racially-oriented community. The notion of Jewish Socialism may provide the answer. Jewish Socialism, like Judaism, is a unique, esoteric ideology that is primarily concerned with Jewish interests and Jewish-ness in general. This is what I found on the ‘Who We Are’ web page that the Jewish Socialist couple are associated with: ‘We (Jewish Socialists’ Groups) unite on issues we recognise as crucial for the future of the Jewish community.’ Seemingly, Julia Bard and her Jewish comrades are part of the Jewish community, and the subjects they are concerned with are issues to do with the future of the Jewish tribe. Reading these lines rings a bell. It was actually my grandfather, the right-wing, racist Irgun commander terrorist, who insisted that ‘Jewish Socialism’ is not only inconsistent, it is deceitful to the bone. The ordinary Marxist may wonder why Julia Bard, David Rosenberg and their comrades echo the words uttered by ultra-Zionist Israeli PM Golda Meir in the 1970s. ‘To me,’ says Meir, ‘being Jewish means and has always meant being proud to be part of a people that has maintained its distinct identity for more than 2,000 years, with all the pain and torment that has been inflicted upon it.’ (Golda Meir, My Life). Meir was also known for suggesting that mixed marriages were the biggest threat to the Jewish people. Like Bard, Meir was concerned with identity politics. Like Bard, Meir was a club member. Like Bard, Meir was worried about assimilation which she regarded as the ‘greatest threat to the Jewish future’. Could it be that Julia Bard and Golda Meir are two sides of the Zionist coin? Surely there is one clear difference? While Meir was an authentic hawk, she spoke tribal and thought tribal, Bard and friends speak ‘universal’ but it seems to me that they think tribal.
    (Atzmon, Gilad (2011-09-30). The Wandering Who: A Study of Jewish Identity Politics (p. 75))

    So Sarah Silverman is certainly NOT a Jew in the context that you are trying to argue.

    Ironically, some people that perceive themselves as Jewish are cultivating a culture of hatred for you on purpose. Not sure why, as servile as you all are to them.

    Lol. The thing about trying to “thought police” an individual that wants to think? It only makes it worse. Jew. Jew. Jew. I’m saying Jew and thinking about why so many creators of the so-called “sexual revolution” were Jewish.

    I’m not sure that it’s all about rainbows for everyone, universally. Sometimes, perhaps… all the time? Probably not.

  10. An interesting aspect of identity politics or tribalism:

    A long time ago I found that through the replacement of the word ‘woman’ with ‘Jew’ and the word ‘man’ with ‘gentile’, a lesbian separatist text could be transformed smoothly into a radical Zionist pamphlet and vice versa. Lesbian separatism is a form of ‘ultimate feminism’; it requires a shift from the realisation that ‘every woman can be a lesbian’ to the radical perception that ‘every woman should be a lesbian.’30 Similarly, a Zionist would argue that ‘every Jew should be a Zionist’ rather than that ‘every Jew can be a Zionist’. Some Zionists would go further and argue that since Israel is ‘the state of the Jewish people’ every Jew should be seen as a Zionist. Accordingly, rejection of Zionism by a Jew should be considered an act of treason, or at very least a form of self-hatred. Naturally, most women would not seriously accept their categorisation by radical feminists. I would say that, at least before the Second World War, the majority of Jews were offended by the Zionist call. It appears that the Holocaust, its exploitation and the unprecedented 1967 Israeli military victory changed the attitude of world Jewry towards Zionism and Israel. The Holocaust was a ‘Zionist victory’, just as each single rape is interpreted by feminist separatist ideologists as a verification of their theories. As we have seen, marginal politics is maintained by hostility against oneself. In order to sustain marginal politics, the loathing directed against oneself becomes advantageous. Zionists rely upon burned synagogues and some lesbian separatists agitators rely upon rape victims. If there were no burned synagogues around, Mossad would go as far as burning some itself31. Within the separatist worldview, such behaviour is legitimate because the end is far more important than the means, and the campaign is more important than any moral integrity.
    (Atzmon, Gilad (2011-09-30). The Wandering Who: A Study of Jewish Identity Politics (pp. 42-43))

    That’s probably why there are many “false flags” and myths (e.g., Matthew Shepherd) surrounding many of these movements within the bowels of the body politic. Because if the Victim Identity* that you’re building for yourself as a tribe based on the idea that someone (or everyone) is out to get you no matter what can’t be justified in reality, then what? After all, if identity politics dissipates then you might have to actually look at yourself, think for yourself and perhaps even look at your own behavior.

    Of course, sometimes people really are out to get you no matter what you do. So there’s that.

    *The “Victim Identity” always reminds me of this instance of identity politics gone awry:

    She used to say that she’d reneged on all her principles by sleeping with a woman who’d slept with a man. And she believed herself to be the victim. After the last beating, she said to me: ‘Look at you. Everyone’s going to think you’re the victim’.
    (The Guardian (London)
    October 19, 1998
    The Guardian Features Page; Pg. 8
    Silent partners
    Byline: Mel Steel)

    There are actually identities within these groups that hate each other. Whether it’s “Not Jewish enough to marry a Cohen.” or “Not lesbian enough to be with me.” Etc.

    But yes, when the majority of “feminists” are Jews… well, that matters. Dumb goyim need to take responsibility for themselves and think for themselves no matter which way their culture is being cultivated by the tribe, regardless. But it’s also not “scape goating” to argue against tribalists creating stupid (clueless, trendy crap) or degrading (on purpose) trends in the culture, media, etc.

    If Jewish ownership of much of the corporate media (increasingly irrelevant)* or the Jewish cultivation of trends in the culture didn’t matter, then people would not be paying billions on media and advertizing. It’s too bad that it matters to the extent that it does.

    It seems like people are herd creatures, so most do not want to think for themselves.

    *The corporate media may be in decline but it still matters for now, given that most people apparently still do not know how to use the internet or set it up to find information, etc. I’m imagining an old Fox News viewer watching O’Reilly, vs. the younger generation putting actual investigative journalists from Youtube or the internet on their TV. If they’re interested in “news” instead of cat videos. Many are not interested in any of it anymore anyway. They know their politicians are lying. What else is new. So maybe this whole thing where much of the internet is higher information content while the aging teleprompter reading corporate media of Zion is almost brain dead can continue for a while longer?

  11. mynym October 10, 2014 at 14:20 “Sarah Silverman says “I would kill Christ again”

    Sarah Silverman is white trash, who will say anything to try to get a laugh.

    Since she does not actually have any sense of humor (like Bill Maher), the only thing she can do is to talk and act as obnoxious as possible.

    Sarah Silverman saying she would kill Christ again is just to try to get a reaction because she does not have any sense of humor and doesn’t know how to tell a joke.

    If she were plain looking, she would be washing dishes. She is just eye candy.

    Sarah Silverman talking about Christ is like a frat boy hanging a booger from his nose and calling it funny.

    Sarah Silverman and others talking about being Jewish is no different from a class clown snorting jello through his nose.

    Sarah Silverman is an atheist and no more Jewish than a Jamaican voodoo priestess.

Comments are closed.