<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Approval @ 45% Rasmussen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawarepolitics.net/obamas-approval-45-rasmussen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/obamas-approval-45-rasmussen/</link>
	<description>Where public policy meets common sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:29:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: noman</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/obamas-approval-45-rasmussen/comment-page-1/#comment-21574</link>
		<dc:creator>noman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7540#comment-21574</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I suggest a moratorium on responding to noman’s nonsense.&lt;/i&gt;

I would support that 100%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I suggest a moratorium on responding to noman’s nonsense.</i></p>
<p>I would support that 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/obamas-approval-45-rasmussen/comment-page-1/#comment-21569</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7540#comment-21569</guid>
		<description>Norman is proud of that ring through his nose; very Soviet-chic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norman is proud of that ring through his nose; very Soviet-chic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEConservative(Evan Q)</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/obamas-approval-45-rasmussen/comment-page-1/#comment-21547</link>
		<dc:creator>DEConservative(Evan Q)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7540#comment-21547</guid>
		<description>I suggest a moratorium on responding to noman&#039;s nonsense.  It&#039;s pointless to argue with someone so blind, deaf and dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest a moratorium on responding to noman&#8217;s nonsense.  It&#8217;s pointless to argue with someone so blind, deaf and dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tennessee Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/obamas-approval-45-rasmussen/comment-page-1/#comment-21541</link>
		<dc:creator>Tennessee Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7540#comment-21541</guid>
		<description>&quot;Obama’s approval might be headed for the  Reagan low of 37%. You know how that turned out.&quot;

Keep Dreaming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Obama’s approval might be headed for the  Reagan low of 37%. You know how that turned out.&#8221;</p>
<p>Keep Dreaming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/obamas-approval-45-rasmussen/comment-page-1/#comment-21511</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7540#comment-21511</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Obama’s approval might be headed for the  Reagan low of 37%. You know how that turned out.&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah. Reagan carried 49 states in &#039;84. That&#039;s because Reagan knew what he was doing; BO doesn&#039;t. He looks more childish every day (it&#039;s all about &lt;i&gt;me&lt;/i&gt;); the independents who were caught-up the &#039;hope and change&#039; euphoria have undergone an expensive reality check. BO may survive; his Socialist-Democrat majority in Congress won&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Obama’s approval might be headed for the  Reagan low of 37%. You know how that turned out.</i></p>
<p>Yeah. Reagan carried 49 states in &#8217;84. That&#8217;s because Reagan knew what he was doing; BO doesn&#8217;t. He looks more childish every day (it&#8217;s all about <i>me</i>); the independents who were caught-up the &#8216;hope and change&#8217; euphoria have undergone an expensive reality check. BO may survive; his Socialist-Democrat majority in Congress won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/obamas-approval-45-rasmussen/comment-page-1/#comment-21485</link>
		<dc:creator>David Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7540#comment-21485</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that he will be able to turn it around by 2010, but you are right, by 2012 this could all be forgotten.  It could also just be the beginning.  Only Larry Sabato has the cyrstal ball.  In an interview, the President said that if by the end of 2011 his poll numbers have tanked, he may not run for reelection.  He will be statisfied with the fact that he brought transformative change to America.  Notice how they are allowing Hillary to stay above the fray?  They are sending puff piece reporters in to booster her image.  I wonder if that is a back up plan.

For the record, I think Hillary Clinton is doing a horrible job as Sec of State.  They even messed up some protocols.  Let alone get policy right.  They are surrendering our self determination to the UN.  What is their to praise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that he will be able to turn it around by 2010, but you are right, by 2012 this could all be forgotten.  It could also just be the beginning.  Only Larry Sabato has the cyrstal ball.  In an interview, the President said that if by the end of 2011 his poll numbers have tanked, he may not run for reelection.  He will be statisfied with the fact that he brought transformative change to America.  Notice how they are allowing Hillary to stay above the fray?  They are sending puff piece reporters in to booster her image.  I wonder if that is a back up plan.</p>
<p>For the record, I think Hillary Clinton is doing a horrible job as Sec of State.  They even messed up some protocols.  Let alone get policy right.  They are surrendering our self determination to the UN.  What is their to praise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noman</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/obamas-approval-45-rasmussen/comment-page-1/#comment-21482</link>
		<dc:creator>noman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7540#comment-21482</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s approval might be headed for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gallup_Poll-Approval_Rating-Ronald_Reagan.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Reagan low&lt;/a&gt; of 37%. You know how that turned out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s approval might be headed for the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gallup_Poll-Approval_Rating-Ronald_Reagan.png" rel="nofollow">Reagan low</a> of 37%. You know how that turned out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

