<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Markell Seeks to Ration Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawarepolitics.net/markell-seeks-to-ration-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/markell-seeks-to-ration-energy/</link>
	<description>Where public policy meets common sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:13:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Can You Grow An Economy By Cutting Energy Consumption? &#124; Delmarva Dealings</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/markell-seeks-to-ration-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-17281</link>
		<dc:creator>How Can You Grow An Economy By Cutting Energy Consumption? &#124; Delmarva Dealings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=5270#comment-17281</guid>
		<description>[...] Case in point – Delaware’s SB106.&#160; This masterpiece of liberal “group think” requires Delaware utilities to cut their consumption by 15% by 2015.&#160; I know, it sounds great.&#160; Wind… Solar … No Nukes and rolling blackouts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Case in point – Delaware’s SB106.&#160; This masterpiece of liberal “group think” requires Delaware utilities to cut their consumption by 15% by 2015.&#160; I know, it sounds great.&#160; Wind… Solar … No Nukes and rolling blackouts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/markell-seeks-to-ration-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-17219</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=5270#comment-17219</guid>
		<description>If &#039;progressive&#039; Socialist-Democrats (who, ironically, fear fission) have their way, we won&#039;t have any &#039;power&#039; to ration. Windmills don&#039;t work with no wind, and solar panels need sunny days. Today&#039;s Socialist-Democrats are common idiots, who just can&#039;t come to grips with reality.

Meanwhile, the rest of the world builds coal-fired and nuclear plants. They laugh at our (or, more properly, our &#039;leaders&#039;) stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If &#8216;progressive&#8217; Socialist-Democrats (who, ironically, fear fission) have their way, we won&#8217;t have any &#8216;power&#8217; to ration. Windmills don&#8217;t work with no wind, and solar panels need sunny days. Today&#8217;s Socialist-Democrats are common idiots, who just can&#8217;t come to grips with reality.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the rest of the world builds coal-fired and nuclear plants. They laugh at our (or, more properly, our &#8216;leaders&#8217;) stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Around the Horn : Delaware Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/markell-seeks-to-ration-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-17172</link>
		<dc:creator>Around the Horn : Delaware Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=5270#comment-17172</guid>
		<description>[...] with no hope of changing minds: it is because we like the battle. Happy Birthday to David Anderson. Delaware Politics thinks Markell wants to ration energy. No, it is called conservation. Conservatives against Conservation. Who knew? Tommywonk answers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with no hope of changing minds: it is because we like the battle. Happy Birthday to David Anderson. Delaware Politics thinks Markell wants to ration energy. No, it is called conservation. Conservatives against Conservation. Who knew? Tommywonk answers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

