How Soon We forget: 3 Del State Students Killed in 2007 by Illegal Alien with child rape charges pending

Senator Bryan Townsend is prime sponsor to Senate Bill 60 which is The TRUST bill. He thinks that people here illegally should be able to trust that we will hide them even when arrested for crimes. I thought that law enforcement had a public trust to enforce the law for the betterment of the community.

My own state representative is a cosponsor. I really don’t understand how my honorable friend, Rep. Sean Lynn can co-sponsor SB 60 which would make Delaware a Sanctuary state. It would over rule local control of cities like Dover that choose to cooperate with federal authorities. If they want to instruct State Police to release back into the community potential felons, at least don’t force the cities to do so. We have enough problems keeping law and order.

We didn’t choose to cooperate in a vacuum. In 2007, 4 Delaware State University Students were shot and 3 died. A Peruvian who was here illegally was responsible. Sadly, he should have never had a chance. He was previously in custody for allegedly raping a 5 year old. Newark, NJ is a sanctuary city. He was released on bond. While free, he participated in the killing of 3 promising young people who were ready to escape the slums and build a better life.

I have to think that if he has the facts that he will abandon this wrong headed policy. President Obama had it right when he said he would focus on felons not families when he set deportation priorities. We deported 3/4 of a million criminals and our crime rate nationally went down. Americans became safer. There are a third of million known criminal illegal aliens still here. Many are protected by Sanctuary polices. Governments should be protecting its own citizens not the feelings of those who violate our laws and cause injury to our people.

I am not asking a lot of my Democratic friends in the General Assembly. I am just asking them to have as much common sense as the leader of their party. They are anxious to run Americans exercising their 2nd Amendment rights through federal data bases for background checks. They are anxious to run our teachers and volunteers through background checks. Why are they afraid to check one more database to see if there is a federal detainer for immigration? If background checks make sense everywhere else, why not in this area?

We can differ on immigration policy, but can’t we all agree that our society is too violent and crime too high to protect criminals from justice so they can continue make our roads less safe, keep our families at risk, and leave an unnecessary trail of tears and pain?

7 thoughts on “How Soon We forget: 3 Del State Students Killed in 2007 by Illegal Alien with child rape charges pending”

  1. “It was appalling to hear Donald Trump describe immigrants as drug dealers, racists and criminals,” Clinton said. “He’s talking about people you and I know. He’s talking about people who love this country, work hard and want nothing more than a chance to build a better life for themselves and this country.”

    You see, this is why I’m a Republican, and could never be a Democrat.

    The intellectually dishonest Democrats are still going about mischaracterizing what Trump said about the illegal aliens (undocumented Democrats) crossing the boarder.

    It’s obvious that Trump didn’t mean ALL of the illegal aliens (undocumented Democrats) were “drug dealers, racists and criminals”. I think she meant “rapists” not “racists”. (Freudian slip)

    Although the Republicans don’t always reflect my opinions on certain subjects ,the fact that Democrats are continually intellectually dishonest (lying) on almost all fronts makes being a Republican an easy choice.

  2. From the bill;

    WHEREAS, unlike criminal detainers and warrants, which comply with fundamental protections under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 6 of the Delaware Constitution, immigration detainers and administrative immigration warrants do not require a showing of probable cause or any of the other procedural protections that undergird the right to be free from unreasonable searches or seizures; and

    WHEREAS, immigration detainers can result in persons being held and transferred into immigration detention without regard to whether their arrest is the result of a mistake, or merely a routine practice of questioning individuals involved in a dispute without pressing charges, and as a result, immigration detainers have erroneously been placed on United States citizens and on immigrants who are not deportable; and

    WHEREAS, immigration detainers and administrative immigration warrants are voluntary requests that generally do not confer arrest authority on State and local law enforcement, and there is no independent State arrest authority for civil immigration matters under an immigration detainer or administrative immigration warrants; and

    WHEREAS, certain programs at the federal level, including the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency’s (ICE) “Secure Communities” program, have shifted the burden of federal civil immigration enforcement onto local law enforcement, including shifting costs for detention of individuals in local custody who would otherwise be released; and

    WHEREAS, a growing number of jurisdictions around the United States, including the City of Philadelphia, the State of California, the State of Connecticut, the State of Rhode Island, and the State of Illinois, have adopted policies of refusing ICE detainer requests when the individual in detention does not pose a risk to public safety, or have otherwise crafted their law-enforcement policies in the spirit of acknowledging the important roles immigrants play in their communities; and

    WHEREAS, immigrants have played and continue to play an essential role in Delaware’s economy; and

    WHEREAS, to encourage immigrants to participate in Delaware’s driving privilege card system, under § 2711(d), Title 21 of the Delaware Code, as well as all other lawful aspects of economic, educational, social, and cultural life in Delaware, and to trust that such open participation and contributions to the economic, public safety, and overall vibrancy of Delaware…

    WHEREAS Delaware chooses to ignore federal laws and thus, demonstrates sympathy with John C. Calhoun and his doctrine of nullification- the power of the states to “nullify” (ignore) federal laws that they don’t agree with- Delaware is, essentially, helping to set a precedent for other states to follow.

    Don’t favor abortion- ignore Roe v Wade.

    Don’t like affirmative action- no problem.

    Don’t believe in gun laws- sell to all.

    Oppose gay marriage- no gay marriage.

    Forced Omabacare- fines or tax, we won’t pay.

    The states of the Heartland join Delaware in support for John C. Calhoun and his doctrine of Nullification!

  3. If you start with this then know one of your main opponents:

    …because of its skill at the word game, La Raza [the Race? Wut race? Is that the same type of social construct that White people are? Etc.] has convinced the press, Congress, the Chamber of Commerce and religious groups of all denominations that we who favor less immigration are lower than pond scum.

    Twenty years ago, the most common term to describe individuals illegally in the U.S. was “illegal immigrant“. Although it appeared in print from time to time, the correct term, “illegal alien” was always a tough sell for us.

    Then, out of nowhere, appeared “undocumented immigrant” appeared. That lasted a while but before long “undocumented worker” replaced it—much more persuasive from La Raza`s view because it suggests that aliens work. That`s not always true, of course, but it sure sounds good.

    Soon thereafter, the “undocumented workers” had deeply rooted and unshakeable “family values.”

    And what are we? Among other things, we are “racists,” “xenophobes,” and “nativists“.

    Now that a growing respect for our position has emerged, we have been upgraded to “anti-immigration” or, the warmest and fuzziest of all the terms used to describe us “immigration restrictionists“.

    As it now stands, we, the “immigration restrictionists” who ride a “wave of hate” are pitted against the “undocumented workers” and their “family values.”

    As I said earlier, you can`t help but admire how cleverly our opposition has outmaneuvered us.
    “Wave of Hate”? More Propaganda From The Treason Lobbyists At La Raza

  4. Here’s Trump, since he’s the one responsible for pushing this issue through the corporate/crackhead media in America: Donald Trump: ‘I Will Win The Latino Vote’ (Full Interview) | NBC News

    15 minutes in, little Miss Muppet makes the same argument against him that Mr. Moseley makes against me.

    Apparently we’re both rumored to be operatives for the Democrats.

    Or something like that. 🙂 I’m actually an operative for White people. Not that they appreciate the ethnic activism that I’m engaged in for them as a group, the ungrateful wretches! Mainly because modern White people (aka wretched refuse?) don’t seem to realize that they exist as a group unless it’s time for them to take the blame for something one last time before being diversified out of existence. Now you see them (explicit blame, explicit calls for more racial* diversity) and now you don’t (It’s all implicit dog whistles, the majority of Republicans… or now “Libertarians” that still look suspiciously like a bunch/majority of White people).

    Fun times.

    *Orwellian concept there… how does anyone know how much diversity there needs to be if there’s no such thing as race in the first place?

    Blacks have been part of the United States for hundreds of years. Brought involuntarily, they have a historic claim on America. Hispanics, whose presence in large numbers is recent and unplanned, have been quick to assume the black mantle of victimhood, to attribute poverty or social failure to racism, and to take advantage of preference programs originally established for descendants of slaves. Many Mexicans become more militant the longer they live in the United States. First-generation immigrants are often grateful merely to be in a developed country rather than one that is badly governed and falling into the hands of drug traffickers. It is the second- and third- generation Hispanics who claim to be victims of oppression and exploitation. Hispanics therefore resemble blacks in their vivid sense of their own group interests, their tendency to see the world in racial/ethnic terms, and their reluctance to adopt the broader American identity whites think necessary for integration and assimilation. This identity is kept fresh by the continuous arrival of new immigrants. However, even if immigration were to stop tomorrow, there are now enough Hispanics—especially Mexicans—to maintain a particularist, parochial identity indefinitely. In the space of just a few decades our country has established a second group of Americans that are racially distinct, with an inward-looking identity, and who suffer disproportionately from poverty, crime, and school failure. WHO ARE THE HISPANICS? In 2009 there were 48.4 million Hispanics in the United States, and they accounted for 16 percent of the population. They were the fastest-growing group in the country, having more than doubled from 22.4 million in 1990. The United States has the second-largest Hispanic population of any country in the world, after Mexico. Sixty-six percent of American Hispanics are of Mexican origin, which means that the equivalent of 30 percent of the population of Mexico lives in the United States.1

    (Taylor, Jared (2012-08-06). White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century (p. 156))

    I should check that last footnote. Is that accurate?

    This is such looney tunes “minority” stuff due to Jewish influence* now. They are the influential Minority above all these other minorities… including the gay minions that they (influentially) allowed a tribal identity to, like Biden said. Biden reminds me of Trump in some ways, I guess if these are the White guys we have on the Left and the Right… then these are the guys we have.

    😐

    *It’s mainly the Jewish Left/Hollywood/ADL/ACLU but it’s not like the “neoconservatives” or the Jewish Right do much to criticize their own tribe to begin to get at the root of the culture producing this gay minority stuff. No matter how many times a Rachel Dolezal (whatever, whoever) claims to be an African that grew up in a Tee Pee, we can’t all be minorities. Back in reality, apparently she’s some muddle headed White girl from Montana.

    In June 2015, Dolezal came to media attention when her white parents said publicly that Dolezal is a white woman passing as black. Their statement followed Dolezal’s reports to police and local news media that she had been the victim of nine hate crimes.[1][8][16] Dolezal’s critics contend that she has committed cultural appropriation and fraud; her supporters contend that her racial identity is genuine, although not based on biology or ancestry.[17] [?????]

    Dolezal was born in Lincoln County, Montana, in 1977 to parents Ruthanne (née Schertel) and Lawrence (Larry) Dolezal, who are white and primarily of Czech, German and Swedish origin.[1][11][18][19] –Wikipedia

    Who knew that a post racial society would be so confusing, huh?

    Apparently it turns out to be quite the theatrical production.

  5. Twenty years ago, the most common term to describe individuals illegally in the U.S. was “illegal immigrant“.

    And thirty years ago, it was “wetback.”

  6. Operation Wetback:

    President Eisenhower cut off this illegal traffic. He did it quickly and decisively with only 1,075 United States Border Patrol agents – less than one-tenth of today’s force. The operation is still highly praised among veterans of the Border Patrol.

    “The rise in illegal border-crossing by Mexican ‘wetbacks’ to a current rate of more than 1,000,000 cases a year has been accompanied by a curious relaxation in ethical standards extending all the way from the farmer-exploiters of this contraband labor to the highest levels of the Federal Government.”

    Years later, the late Herbert Brownell Jr., Eisenhower’s first attorney general, said in an interview with this writer that the president had a sense of urgency about illegal immigration when he took office.

    America “was faced with a breakdown in law enforcement on a very large scale,” Mr. Brownell said. “When I say large scale, I mean hundreds of thousands were coming in from Mexico [every year] without restraint.”

    Bill Chambers, who worked for a combined 33 years for the Border Patrol and the then-called US Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), says politically powerful people are still fueling the flow of illegals.

    During the 1950s, however, this “Good Old Boy” system changed under Eisenhower – if only for about 10 years.
    ….
    Then on June 17, 1954, what was called “Operation Wetback” began. Because political resistance was lower in California and Arizona, the roundup of aliens began there. Some 750 agents swept northward through agricultural areas with a goal of 1,000 apprehensions a day. By the end of July, over 50,000 aliens were caught in the two states. Another 488,000, fearing arrest, had fled the country.

    By mid-July, the crackdown extended northward into Utah, Nevada, and Idaho, and eastward to Texas.

    By September, 80,000 had been taken into custody in Texas, and an estimated 500,000 to 700,000 illegals had left the Lone Star State voluntarily.

    Unlike today, Mexicans caught in the roundup were not simply released at the border, where they could easily reenter the US. To discourage their return, Swing arranged for buses and trains to take many aliens deep within Mexico before being set free.
    How Eisenhower solved illegal border crossings from Mexico

    It doesn’t matter right now though, as easy as it might be for an actual leader to protect citizens from rape and murder and American workers from having their wages decreased.

    Due to utterly toxic Jewish influence in the culture as well as other causes (perhaps just the usual end of Empires*), a leader that does anything significant can be portrayed as a racist/”another Hitler” while Team Superman Jewish Cartoon traipses off around the world to defeat “another Hitler.”

    It’s about saving minorities, not national security.

    *But there again, what were the Jews up to in all these other empires too? Agitating minorities? Creating minorities where there need be none? “Advising” leaders? Financing political puppets? It may be the life cycle of empires, bread and circuses to the end. It would be interesting to contrast the Chinese or groups not as subject to Jewish influence with empires subject to Jewish influence.

    Regardless, to insist that the American Empire and its culture is not subject to Jewish influence as people writing political commentary here do is utterly crazy. It’s Jewish influence, at least Biden got that right. Kind of ironic that they usually get into trouble for the truth.

    Go into a Dunkin Donuts lately? Was he telling the truth or not? If the Democrats get more of the unrelenting stream that they are using against traditional groups of Americans, then bozo the clown will have to thought police himself in a multicultural police state even more.

    One is left to wonder with these frat boys running the country, what do they think they’re doing? At a lower level, perhaps rich “White flight” liberals want a bigger house or a better SUV and whatever. Yet what good does that do if their children are going to be blended out of existence based on their cowardice or stupidity? But I guess that goes back to whatever children survive the abortions, the divorces and now perhaps the “gay marriages” soon to be followed by more divorces and perhaps a debt/money collapse on the heads of their children.

    It’s very odd to me how frivolous and gay many White people are being these days. White gays that think they have the theatrical production of some gay rainbow identity instead of the White identity that they actually have seem to have hitched their fortunes to a falling star.

    Shrug. At least it will not affect my family much. And I do what I can to form a group or groups.* I’m aware of the tendency of White tribes of the North to think that we need to head for the hills of liberty as individuals while avoiding large groups.

    *Enter Mr. Moseley, “Yeah, join the Republicans!” Wrongo. Let me know when they’re as anxious to reach out to the White community as they are to the Hispanic/Jewish/African communities. But if Trump somehow winds up doing this implicitly (With a great big dog whistle for brain dead Whites, I suppose?) and other minorities (perhaps Africans and Native Americans) want to align with us because it’s in their interests to align with indigenous Americans… then I’d consider the Republican team/tribe/group.

    Meanwhile, they’ve done zero to reach out to the White community and are still running around like White chickens with their heads cut off if one of their fake tribe/team members so much as may have at a real lobby group for Americans of European descent.

    Has Jeb Bush spoken at a La Raza event yet? Because both Bernie Sanders* (the Minority of all minorities) and Hillary Clinton (shabbos goyim) have…

    *That would be great. You probably haven’t seen anything yet if Jewish agitation really gets going in this country. Bring in all of India as a “minority” and then clamp down on everyone with “hate speech” laws from the ADL and the equality crowd when they say, “Who did this? What the heck is going on here? The Indian lobby now wants to arrest Joe Biden for his hate speech, retroactively!”

    Etc. I have to make satire extreme these days, otherwise it usually winds up being true.

    (In Jews, Indian-Americans See a Role Model in Activism … NYT)
    (Know Your Rights – Hindu American Foundation)

    😐

    Check for yourselves and see if what Mr. Moseley says about my “blather” is true, that I’m supposedly just making assertions based on pretty much nothing and what not. (Who would actually do such a thing as far as blathering on without an observable fact in sight, in reality? COUGH it begins with an M but it’s not me! )

  7. Our White politicians will speak to everyone and their mother with a lobby group:

    When the Hindu American Foundation began, it looked to groups like the Anti-Defamation League and the Simon Wiesenthal [somewhat fraudulent] Center for guidance with its advocacy and lobbying efforts.
    Indian-Americans, who now number 2.4 million in this country, are turning to American Jews as role models and partners in areas like establishing community centers, advocating on civil rights issues and lobbying Congress.
    Indians often say they see a version of themselves and what they hope to be in the experience of Jews in American politics: a small minority that has succeeded in combating prejudice and building political clout. [Except if the Jews tell them not to talk about Jewish influence in all this too much. After all, minority minions among the goyim need to know their place!]

    Sanjay Puri, the chairman of the U.S. India Political Action Committee, said: “What the Jewish community has achieved politically is tremendous, [conspiracy theory?] and members of Congress definitely pay a lot of attention to issues that are important to them. We will use our own model to get to where we want, but we have used them as a benchmark.”
    (In Jews, Indian-Americans See a Role Model in Activism …
    The New York Times
    Oct 2, 2007)

    Expect more ethnic bylines to look at if one ever wonders why they’re anti-White and see Whites as racist oppressors that need to be diversified out of existence as a group and so on.

    But like I’ve been saying, one can’t blame the growing majority of minorities that have ill will toward White people too much. The answer as to why this is occurring is right here on this blog in the person of Mr. Moseley and other brain dead White people that refuse to admit that White people exist. Gays? Yeah, liberals like that. Hispanics? Yeah, most Republicans want more outreach. Jews? Ha… how may everyone in the entire political system be of service to them as a group?

    Whites? No. They don’t even exist as a group. To the extent that the government and the media and corporations in America explicitly admitted that White people exist, they need to be diversified out of existence as a group (That didn’t exist or have any ethnic interests like these other groups, a second ago.).

Comments are closed.