Hard to Stay Away…
Sep 2nd, 2009 by admin
…when things like this pop up.
The cost of building the new Laurel paramedic station just went up. Even though contracts have been awarded and construction is taking place, Sussex County officials are being forced to pay an additional $56,000 in wages to meet the state’s prevailing wage regulations.
The added cost drives the price of the project to more than $200,000.
So for all you annoying twits who used to argue with me about the costs of prevailing wage, here we have a case where a project was increased by more than 33% by the addition of prevailing wage. And please note that the initial budget already had all of the market wages covered. So this is 33% of the entire cost of the project just to meet the DIFFERENCE between the market wage and the prevailing wage.
Unions are robbing you blind.










“We were not aware this was a requirement when this was bid,” Baker said.
I guess they aren’t Delaware Politics readers.
Sussex County officials are being forced to pay an additional $56,000 in wages to meet the state’s prevailing wage regulations… The added cost drives the price of the project to more than $200,000.
What the heck kind of facility were they going to build for $140K, even without prevailing wage?
Well, it was gonna be a cost effective one…
Maybe a little research is in order… Who is the contractor? After you subtract out materials and overhead, what were they actually paying their people?
Are there any journalists downstate who could actually find out some of this stuff and maybe, y’know, talk to some of the workers?
What is interesting is the underlying dollars and cents change. This little glitch takes the argument into the real world.
By the way, if Sussex doesn’t want to pay prevailing wage, they don’t have to.
They do have another available option if they feel that strongly about paying workers a fair rate:
Give. Back. The. Money.
Not sure why the final cost was such a surprise, they were estimating it at $250K back in February. From the Council minutes:
Maria: “Well, it was gonna be a cost effective one…”
It is, Maria!
When was the last time all five members of the SCC ever voted together for the same thing?
Thanks for the research, noman — very informative, very interesting, very good!!!
Perry, they all voted for it at the pre-prevailing wage price. The vote was 3-1 to pay the extra $56K.
Not sure why the final cost was such a surprise, they were estimating it at $250K back in February.
Maybe it’s a “surprise” because the actual bid that the Council approved was a $156K project.
Excuse me, $152K.
Now the question – did Temco win the bid because they lowballed the labor costs based on illegal labor rates?