Delaware’s Congressional Delegation Had Differing Responses to BEBE

Senator Carper seemed to forget his moderate image and boycotted the Netanyahu address, while Senator Coons and Congressman Carney found common ground with his concern about Iran. While Carney faulted Boehner for politicizing the format, he thought Netanyahu gave a strong speech and was acting in his nation’s interests.

I agree with Congressman Carney that the PM was acting his nation’s interest, but I also think the Speaker was. He was asserting the duty of Congress to bring to the forefront a critical issue that affects our national interest. It is not politicizing something to debate and discuss it. 90% of the politicizing was on the side of the Obama administration and Minority leader Pelosi. They are the ones who appeal to partisanship and image while refusing to discuss the issue. That is the essence of politicizing the issue.

15 thoughts on “Delaware’s Congressional Delegation Had Differing Responses to BEBE”

  1. Obviously, any Jew voting for a Democrat is like a turkey voting for Thanksgiving. But any other US citizen voting for the Democrats is just as self-destructive.

    Can any Jew trust the Democrat Party? Not only are Democrats not able to defend Jews overseas, but here at home in the USA the hostility is growing constantly.

  2. It would have been nice if Senator Carper tried representing the people of Delaware by learning more about foreign policy. He could have attended Netanyahu’s speech and learned something, instead of insulting one of our allies in the Middle-east by boycotting the speech with many other numsculls. I guess his first priority is to kiss King Obama’s butt, instead of representing Delaware.

  3. @JM: Any Jew voting for a Democrat is like a turkey voting for Thanksgiving.

    There are 28 Jews serving in Congress. Only 1 is a Republican. Presumably they voted for themselves. Or maybe you think that also is a liberal anti-semitic myth.

  4. From Twitter.com, two Tweets from commenter David Burge, @iowahawkblog. . .

    Before the speech:

    “I’m grateful that we have a leader in Washington who really cares about America. Welcome Bibi!”

    https://twitter.com/iowahawkblog/status/572160017454931970

    After the speech, and its news coverage:

    “NPR report: Bibi “spoke before a mostly Republican audience.” So, sort of like the State of the Union.”

    https://twitter.com/iowahawkblog/status/572898869299658753

    You may now return to your regularly scheduled bickering.

  5. Obviously, any Jew voting for a Democrat is like a turkey voting for Thanksgiving.

    Jewish political operatives are Socialists, so naturally, they work for the Socialist political party, the Democrats. The communist ideal is more important to them than Israel.

    Please, don’t waste my time with your typical “what Jewish communists?!!” nonsense.

  6. Viking explorers had begun to be in Iceland in the ninth century, carrying
    with them the Old Norse language. Go through the next set of doors and go down the hallway to find the autopsy room.
    Below is a list of character fatality moves that
    you can perform during intense combat.

    My blog – generateur de code psn (Shad)

  7. Rick March 5, 2015 at 09:48 “Jewish political operatives are Socialists ….”

    False premise. And untrue.

    The politically active Jews I first met were part of the Reagan Administration and campaign… and fighting for conservative principles, not like the liberal big-government Republicans from they Ivy League the Bushies.

    The Bush family is way more liberal than the average Jew.
    Jews I know in politics: Larry Klayman, Messianic Jew, Makes Ted Cruz look like a socialist. Larry Klayman is fighting against amnesty. Has filed a petition to have Barack Obama deported.

    Another politically-active Jew I know is Bob Weiner, then at the time the head of the Maranatha Campus Ministries. I first met Maranatha when they were leading 70 protests across the country in support of Ronald Reagan’s foreign policy opposing communism in Central America.

    Another Jew I know is Leonid Kuleshov, formerly my translator in Latvia. He is more conservative than you are, Rick.

    So, no, sorry, your generalization won’t fly.

    Your arguments about Jews come down to saying:

    “The sky is green.”

    Why do you say that?

    “Because the sky is green.”

  8. And remember: The only way that the Democrat Party can hang on to the Jewish vote is to convince Jews that Republicans hate them, to stir up conflict between Jews and other Republicans.

    And…. OH LOOK! Here they are… Right on cue !!!

    The only hope of the Democrat Party is to make Jews think that other Republicans hate them.

    And waddya know!!! Here they are trying to stir up conflict between Jews and other Republicans.

    Sorry. The Democrat Party is losing the young vote, losing the Black vote, losing the Jewish vote, losing the Middle Class, and losing the Catholic vote.

    Hang on to your Democrat bumper stickers and pins. They will be a piece of history when the Democrat Party goes the way of the dinosaurs.

  9. Nice post. I learn something new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon everyday.

    It’s always interesting to read content from other writers and practice something from their sites.

  10. The politically active Jews I first met were part of the Reagan Administration and campaign… and fighting for conservative…blah, blah, blah…

    Have you lost your mind? Ever heard of Karl Marx? Leon Trotsky (Bronstein)? Baron Rothschild?

    From American Hebrew Magazine;

    “The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction, and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world.”

    Ever heard of Stephen Wise, who pushed Wilson toward the income tax and central banking (straight out of the Communist Manifesto)? How about Franz Boas, who polluted academia to this day? Or Sidney Morganthau, who gave us the New Deal?

    Ever heard of Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan and Bella Abzug? Or Saul Alinsky and George Soros? How about Allen Ginsburg, Felix Frankfurter (ACLU) or the ever-popular Jerry Rubin and Abbie Hoffman?

    Wake-up, Mosley, you’re either blind or hopelessly brainwashed.

  11. I agree with Congressman Carney that the PM was acting his nation’s interest, but I also think the Speaker was. He was asserting the duty of Congress to bring to the forefront a critical issue that affects our national interest.

    That link is tenuous at best. For example… Pakistan is full of crazy people, yet:

    Finally, on 28 May 1998, a few weeks after India’s second nuclear test (Operation Shakti), Pakistan detonated five nuclear devices in the Ras Koh Hills in the Chagai district, Balochistan. –Wikipedia

    Verification on the craziness:

    (Pakistan: Lawmakers Pledge Martyrdom for Islam While Hundreds March Demanding Execution of Cartoonists)
    (Pakistan: Sufi Moslem Sacrifices Five of His Own Children to Gain Magical Powers)
    (The Religion of Peace: Moslems Slaughter 130 Schoolchildren in Northwest Pakistan)
    (Pakistan: Legal Status of Cannibalism Finally Being Debated by Government)
    (Pregnant Woman Stoned to Death by Own Family in Front of Pakistani High Court)
    (Pakistani Husband Hacks Own Bride’s Legs Off with an Axe)
    (Cannibals Arrested with Severed Head of Child)
    (Church Bombing: Deadliest Ever Attack on Pakistani Christians Kills 75)
    (Pakistan Ex-Leader Musharraf Charged Over Bhutto Murder)

    Nazi headlines, they’re the best.

    Crazy Islamic nations where people might be terrorists already have nukes, so this is about Israeli interests in the region first and foremost. End. (On a side note, American immigration policies are letting them live here too!)

    Islamic cultures chock full of crazy people already have nuclear weapons, so if you’re concerned that they’re going to bring some over then step up surveillance with more people like Edward Snowden and hire more translators like Sibel Edmonds. In the meantime, it’s beginning to look suspiciously like our own politicians are threatening us with WMDs if we do not support them. They (you?) now have a culture in the corporate media in America that if any “incident” happens they/you can immediately point at Iran (One hour later, case closed!) or a veritable list of nations to attack in a New Israeli/”American” Century.

    We will have to watch for bulldozing the crime scene, classifying it all at the behest of “higher ups” and so on. Then there’s the bureaucratic inertia where bungling careerists look like they’re engaged in a vast “conspiracy”…. to protect their careers and budgets. Apparently it’s only the “conspiracy theorists” that will ask, if official sources told you that they found the truth by bulldozing the crime scene and getting rid of all the evidence then why is whatever evidence that couldn’t be cleaned up by the clean up crews.. still classified? Apparently we will be the only people to make FOIA requests. The only people to send a lobbyist to DC, etc.

    Anyway, remember:
    (Lindsey Graham Implies Failure to Strike Syria May Result …)
    (Lindsey Graham: If Crimea Becomes Russia, Iran Will Get …)

    (????)

    Guess he was wrong.

    Perhaps a different meta narrative:
    (Lindsey Graham Implies That a Failure to Strike Syria Will Make Him Gay!)

    Ok, I just made that one up. The rest are actual headlines from the net linked to actual, observable events.

  12. Wake-up, Mosley, you’re either blind or hopelessly brainwashed.

    Probably just me…. but I think he’d be a much better defense lawyer for “Da Joos” by admitting some collective wrong doing without admitting or focusing on the whole truth and nothing but the collective truth.

    Sort of like blown cover as cover or a half truth: “Ah, you got me!” (The fine print: But not really! Shew.)

    Anyway, if I really thought that I would mess up his attempts to win elections then I would consider ending my culture of critique for the tribe that invented it for everyone else. For the record, I’m not a Republican. But I can vouch for them and Mr. Moseley. They’re as kosher as the Likud. In fact, one could be forgiven for wondering if they’re the same thing.

    So “the 1%” can still rain money on them based on an “Is it good for the Jews?” mentality if you want to do that.

    My question is different from the Democrats and the Republicans… is it good for all Americans and does it promote the general welfare?

  13. Rick March 6, 2015 at 09:43 “Have you lost your mind? Ever heard of Karl Marx? Leon Trotsky (Bronstein)? Baron Rothschild?”

    Let’s see, the CAPITALIST Baron Rothschild?

    Karl Marx — a German Lutheran

    As for these quotes, I spent hundreds of hours in the Library of Congress tracking them down.

    Not a single one ever check out as accurate.

    REMEMBER WHAT ABRAHAM LINCOLN WARNED: “You can’t trust everything you read on the internet.”

    “Ever heard of Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan and Bella Abzug? ”

    Ever heard of the THOUSANDS of non-Jews who were also leaders, too?

    Sprinkling a few Jews here and there into a 99.999% WASP liberal movement does not transform all the WASPS’s into Jews.

  14. mynym March 6, 2015 at 16:24 “Probably just me…. but I think he’d be a much better defense lawyer for “Da Joos” by admitting some collective wrong …”

    Ah, here is a separate controversy of its own.

    How can there be “COLLECTIVE WRONG…?”

    This is of course the heartbeat of the racist and anti-Semite.

    The racists and anti-semites are committed to the fundamental rejection of personal guilt and personal responsibility.

    To escape the terrifying reality of their own personal sin before a Holy God, they invent a race-based religion.

    Their theory is that there is “COLLECTIVE VIRTUE” so that White people are exempt from damnation simply because they are White.

    And they try to make other races collectively guilty simply for their race.

    But there is no such concept.

    ———————————————————————
    ROMANS 3 Then what advantage has the Jew? Or what is the benefit of circumcision? 2 Great in every respect. First of all, that they were entrusted with the oracles of God. 3 What then? If some did not believe, their unbelief will not nullify the faithfulness of God, will it? 4 May it never be! Rather, let God be found true, though every man be found a liar, as it is written,

    “That You may be justified in Your words,
    And prevail when You are judged.”

    5 But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say? The God who inflicts wrath is not unrighteous, is He? (I am speaking in human terms.) 6 May it never be! For otherwise, how will God judge the world? 7 But if through my lie the truth of God abounded to His glory, why am I also still being judged as a sinner? 8 And why not say (as we are slanderously reported and as some claim that we say), “Let us do evil that good may come”? Their condemnation is just.

    9 What then? Are we better than they? Not at all; for we have already charged that both Jews and Greeks are all under sin; 10 as it is written, “There is none righteous, not even one;
    11 There is none who understands,
    There is none who seeks for God;
    12 All have turned aside, together they have become useless;
    There is none who does good, There is not even one.”
    ——————————————————

    There is no such thing as COLLECTIVE WRONG or collective guilt.

    Ezekiel 18:20 “The person who sins will die. The son will not bear the punishment for the father’s iniquity, nor will the father bear the punishment for the son’s iniquity; the righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself.”

Comments are closed.