Please read the first part for context. Now let us examine the political implications. I read that the change in demographics means the Republican Party will disappear or it will have to become like the Democrats. Is that true? The question for the Republican Party is how will it adjust? The nation is changing faster than the party. The party has a significant nativist element like my Professor friend. If they are blasted as irrelevant racists and the legitimate concerns about the obvious concerns and tensions of our changing demographics. Integration is not without challenges. If we ignore that fact, it will be at our peril. The key is to develop a plan to deal with the legitimate challenges without abandoning our culture of welcoming legal immigrants. We have done it before, we can do it again. My contention is that integration done properly has far greater rewards. It is the only hope for keeping America a dynamic world power. Europe is fading into history because it cannot adjust to the new global age. The dynamic of the world is shifting from West back East. The East is rising and the West is setting. America is in between. We can choose. Our secret weapon is the fact that we have the ability to pull from the culture and experiences of 200 nations. We are a nation of creativity. We still have the strength of faith which Europe lost. Our institutions are strong and resilient. We are a nation of individuals not groups. We are a nation of the rule of law not the rule of men. Some people believe that the fact America is now 35% Latino, Black, Asian, and American Indian means the end to Republican Party when that number reachs 45% let alone a majority. If the party does not integrate, it will be replaced. It cannot survive in its current demographic configuration another 25 years as a national force. The question then is how is the party to adjust? Does it need to abandon the majority views and become like the Democrats or is there another way? I believe there is a better way. Part of it is to get down to business. If your business were faced with declining market share, would you just complain about it or would you get focus groups, walk around in communities, examine the needs of the market and develop new product lines? If you do the former then you will go the F.W. Woolworth or John-Manville. The other choice is to go the way of IBM or Ford and constantly adjust without losing your identity. The fact is that almost 40% of Latinos and Asians already vote Republican. The first place to start is to find out why they do. It is like finding out that people who chew a certain bark have less inflamation and break fevers. Find out what is working in it and mass produce it. As a rule the longer people are here, the more likely they are to vote Republican. The more religious they are, the more likely they are to vote Republican. The more likely they are to serve in the military or own a business, the more likely they are to vote Republican. That tells me three keys to Republican survivial are restoring Americanism to the schools, free market advocacy, and embracing people of faith. A fourth key is finding how to market these values to people who already hold them. I believe the GOP can become the party for Americanism and thereby will be the majority party for Americans of goodwill from all ethnic groups. The party must do two things. One it must give a clear vision to replace multiculturalism with a diverse vision of Americanism. Multiculturalism as currently taught will divide America. The multiculturalists are correct that we need to value and embrace the diverse contributions of people from various backgrounds. Sadly, the multiculturalists seem to devalue Western values which have given the highest standard of living, the highest level of personal fulfillment, and popularized the idea of human rights. How is it valuing all cultures to attack your own? The Texas board was right to tackle the wild views in textbooks. Quietly, we must bring common sense to textbooks. Every interest group has an influence, Americanism and Patriotism should have as much influence. Once the young people are taught Entrepreneurism, Patriotism, and critical thinking, they will be open to all reasoned approaches. It will be up to the parties to appeal based upon the best instincts of Americans not trying to divide us by class and ethinic group. Second, the party must find out what the stumbling blocks are either real or perceived today. One obvious one is that we have to tell our consultants to stop ignoring huge groups of people. Nativism will not work. If you do not know how to appeal to them, educate yourself. I think the Marco Rubio, Niki Haley, and Susana Martinez teams should become consultants for the national party. They won’t need them next year anyway. Rubio took the majority of the Hispanic vote. Martinez won in a state that is almost half Latino, 10% American Indian and only 40% White. Both did it with a welcoming but unmistakably conservative message. Both are full spectrum conservatives. The party does not have to change its identity. It just needs to become relevant and welcoming. Look at the fate of the GOP in California and compare it to New Mexico. The California Party under Wilson allowed legitimate concerns to be spun as anti-immigrant. The party in New Mexico explained to people that enforcing some laws was to the benefit of everyone. We do not need to change our conservative identity. In fact, changing its identity will weaken its ability to attract people. Strong families, free markets, and liberty cross all boundaries to protect them, we all need to stand together.