<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 31 To 0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawarepolitics.net/31-to-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/31-to-0/</link>
	<description>Where public policy meets common sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: noman</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/31-to-0/comment-page-1/#comment-20936</link>
		<dc:creator>noman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7155#comment-20936</guid>
		<description>There are some things even a dog won&#039;t do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some things even a dog won&#8217;t do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Fish</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/31-to-0/comment-page-1/#comment-20934</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Fish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7155#comment-20934</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t I marry my dog?

I LOVE my dog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t I marry my dog?</p>
<p>I LOVE my dog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hube</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/31-to-0/comment-page-1/#comment-20928</link>
		<dc:creator>Hube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7155#comment-20928</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;They do. Delaware has an anti-abortion law in place. What you are wishing for is the overturning of our Constitution and its system of checks and balances.&lt;/i&gt;

Except, of course, that the state cannot enact an anti-abortion law b/c of us -- get this -- the Constitution and its system of checks and balances.

&lt;i&gt;Where do you find the ‘right’ to abortion in the Constitution? You don’t because it isn’t there; hence, it is strictly a mater for the states under Amendment X.&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, part of &lt;i&gt;Roe&lt;/i&gt; deals not with the 10th but &lt;i&gt;9th&lt;/i&gt; Amendment which states &lt;i&gt;The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, &lt;b&gt;shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; Such as the right to privacy, you see. Not that I necessarily agree w/all the reasoning behind &lt;i&gt;Roe,&lt;/i&gt; mind you. 

&lt;i&gt;We learned the lesson of allowing the states to determine if they will protect life, liberty, and property of all persons 150 years ago and passed the civil rights amendments 13-15.&lt;/i&gt;

Except that many believe that forcing a woman to carry a child to term against her will is a violation &lt;i&gt;of&lt;/i&gt; that said 13th Amendment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>They do. Delaware has an anti-abortion law in place. What you are wishing for is the overturning of our Constitution and its system of checks and balances.</i></p>
<p>Except, of course, that the state cannot enact an anti-abortion law b/c of us &#8212; get this &#8212; the Constitution and its system of checks and balances.</p>
<p><i>Where do you find the ‘right’ to abortion in the Constitution? You don’t because it isn’t there; hence, it is strictly a mater for the states under Amendment X.</i></p>
<p>Actually, part of <i>Roe</i> deals not with the 10th but <i>9th</i> Amendment which states <i>The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, <b>shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.</b></i> Such as the right to privacy, you see. Not that I necessarily agree w/all the reasoning behind <i>Roe,</i> mind you. </p>
<p><i>We learned the lesson of allowing the states to determine if they will protect life, liberty, and property of all persons 150 years ago and passed the civil rights amendments 13-15.</i></p>
<p>Except that many believe that forcing a woman to carry a child to term against her will is a violation <i>of</i> that said 13th Amendment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/31-to-0/comment-page-1/#comment-20917</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7155#comment-20917</guid>
		<description>Evan is right, the country already reached a balance.  Some states like HI, DE, NY, CA had liberal abortion laws and the other states stricter laws.    The high court hijacked the entire process and made it almost no law.  It had to back away a little over the years but is still outrageous from any constitutional perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan is right, the country already reached a balance.  Some states like HI, DE, NY, CA had liberal abortion laws and the other states stricter laws.    The high court hijacked the entire process and made it almost no law.  It had to back away a little over the years but is still outrageous from any constitutional perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/31-to-0/comment-page-1/#comment-20916</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7155#comment-20916</guid>
		<description>Now let&#039;s get back to marriage.  Praise GOD!  We are still the USA and not the United States of Sodom.  We understand that marriage is between a man and woman not some pc fiction.  What encouraged me was the under 30 numbers.  Just under half of voters 18 to 29 voted with their elders.  That means the victory is sustainable.  Now we need to watch the NJ lameduck.  Christie is an outspoken defender of traditional marriage and the family.  The Dems may try a lame duck push.  Every one in NJ needs to call their assemblyman and senator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now let&#8217;s get back to marriage.  Praise GOD!  We are still the USA and not the United States of Sodom.  We understand that marriage is between a man and woman not some pc fiction.  What encouraged me was the under 30 numbers.  Just under half of voters 18 to 29 voted with their elders.  That means the victory is sustainable.  Now we need to watch the NJ lameduck.  Christie is an outspoken defender of traditional marriage and the family.  The Dems may try a lame duck push.  Every one in NJ needs to call their assemblyman and senator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEConservative(Evan Q)</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/31-to-0/comment-page-1/#comment-20915</link>
		<dc:creator>DEConservative(Evan Q)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7155#comment-20915</guid>
		<description>&quot;Let each state vote on what regulations they desire.

They do. Delaware has an anti-abortion law in place. What you are wishing for is the overturning of our Constitution and its system of checks and balances.&quot; - noman

You mean the Constitution that the Supreme Court trampled all over with this particular piece of legislation from the bench?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Let each state vote on what regulations they desire.</p>
<p>They do. Delaware has an anti-abortion law in place. What you are wishing for is the overturning of our Constitution and its system of checks and balances.&#8221; &#8211; noman</p>
<p>You mean the Constitution that the Supreme Court trampled all over with this particular piece of legislation from the bench?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/31-to-0/comment-page-1/#comment-20913</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7155#comment-20913</guid>
		<description>I personally favor a federal personhood law under the authority of the 5th and 14th amendment overturning Roe.  Then the unborn would have all of the federal protections under the constitution that every other person has.  It would be up to the states to figure out ways to protect that person in their jurisdiction and the feds in their own.  We learned the lesson of allowing the states to determine if they will protect life, liberty, and property of all persons 150 years ago and passed the civil rights amendments 13-15.  That is my view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally favor a federal personhood law under the authority of the 5th and 14th amendment overturning Roe.  Then the unborn would have all of the federal protections under the constitution that every other person has.  It would be up to the states to figure out ways to protect that person in their jurisdiction and the feds in their own.  We learned the lesson of allowing the states to determine if they will protect life, liberty, and property of all persons 150 years ago and passed the civil rights amendments 13-15.  That is my view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/31-to-0/comment-page-1/#comment-20904</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7155#comment-20904</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What you are wishing for is the overturning of our Constitution and its system of checkand balances.&lt;/i&gt;

Where do you find the &#039;right&#039; to abortion in the Constitution? You don&#039;t because it isn&#039;t there; hence, it is strictly a mater for the states under Amendment X.

 Of course, liberals found it (the &#039;right&#039; to abortion) in the non-existent &#039;penumbra&#039; of &lt;i&gt;implied&lt;/i&gt; rights; yet they continually circumvent the &lt;i&gt;specifically granted&lt;/i&gt; right to keep and bear arms, clearly articulated in Amendment II.

 Why are Socialist-Democrats such frauds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What you are wishing for is the overturning of our Constitution and its system of checkand balances.</i></p>
<p>Where do you find the &#8216;right&#8217; to abortion in the Constitution? You don&#8217;t because it isn&#8217;t there; hence, it is strictly a mater for the states under Amendment X.</p>
<p> Of course, liberals found it (the &#8216;right&#8217; to abortion) in the non-existent &#8216;penumbra&#8217; of <i>implied</i> rights; yet they continually circumvent the <i>specifically granted</i> right to keep and bear arms, clearly articulated in Amendment II.</p>
<p> Why are Socialist-Democrats such frauds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noman</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/31-to-0/comment-page-1/#comment-20899</link>
		<dc:creator>noman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7155#comment-20899</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Let each state vote on what regulations they desire.&lt;/i&gt;

They do. Delaware has an anti-abortion law in place. What you are wishing for is the overturning of our Constitution and its system of checks and balances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Let each state vote on what regulations they desire.</i></p>
<p>They do. Delaware has an anti-abortion law in place. What you are wishing for is the overturning of our Constitution and its system of checks and balances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delaware Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.delawarepolitics.net/31-to-0/comment-page-1/#comment-20898</link>
		<dc:creator>Delaware Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawarepolitics.net/?p=7155#comment-20898</guid>
		<description>You may disagree with me but I wish we could take abortion to the polls also and take it away from the politicians.

Let each state vote on what regulations they desire.

Mike Protack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may disagree with me but I wish we could take abortion to the polls also and take it away from the politicians.</p>
<p>Let each state vote on what regulations they desire.</p>
<p>Mike Protack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

